Margaret
Whitstock
CAN RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE OF MEDICAL INFORMATION
BETWEEN PRACTISING CLINICIANS AND CLINICAL RESEARCHERS
HAVE A BENEFICIAL IMPACT ON THE APPLICABILITY AND USABILITY
OF EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL RESEARCH? (Masters
by Research)
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) literature frequently refers
to gaps between available clinical research evidence and
its implementation in clinical practice. The prevailing
EBM view is that the problem locus lies after the generation
of research evidence, so efforts to reduce or remove the
gaps have targeted a range of individual, organisational,
resource and information issues that could contribute
to improvement in implementation capability. However,
others take the position that there is a need for the
realities of clinical practice to inform clinical research,
so that the outcomes of research are more readily applicable
to the target populations.
Margaret's study is exploring practising clinicians'
and clinical researchers' views on whether reciprocal
information exchanges before and during the clinical research
process could have a beneficial impact on the applicability
and usability of evidence from clinical research and contribute
to improving the uptake of clinical research evidence
in clinical practice. [Supervisors: G. Johanson, K. Williamson]
|