|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
BREAST CANCER
KNOWLEDGE ONLINE
|
 |
 |
An Intelligent, User-Sensitive Portal to Breast Cancer Knowledge Online
|
PHASE ONE OVERVIEW
Background:
The unmet information and decision-support
needs of women with breast cancer and their families;
Addressing
the need
for customised, in-time access to breast cancer knowledge;
Project Benefits
Project Methodology
Project Timetable
BCKOnline
Metadata Schema
|
| Background: The unmet information and decision-support needs of women with breast cancer and their families |
|
|
Consumers
access to information and the ability to make decisions
about their own health and well-being are important
rights. In addition there is a growing body of evidence
to support the argument that greater consumer participation
in health care improves clinical outcomes.
(1)
Breast
cancer features prominently in the nations
medical expenditure. It remains the largest cancer
killer amongst women with 2,500 deaths annually
and 10,000 new cases per annum.(2)
Despite the plethora of information resources
available online for Australian women with breast
cancer and their families, numerous studies have
documented user dissatisfaction with the timeliness,
relevance, format and quality of breast cancer information
provision.(3) Predominantly,
the resources are presented from a medical perspective
and/or designed for a homogenous mass audience.
Breast cancer information resources emanate from
a variety of organizations and institutions. Consistency
of content and quality varies greatly(4)
as does accessibility and useability. Research has
detailed the constantly changing information needs
of women as they proceed along the breast cancer
trajectory(5),
yet none of the existing resources attempt to deliver
personalised information which meets the dynamic
needs of the individual woman and her family. The
woman is invariably viewed as a patient,
a member of a uniform group where one size
fits all. Factors such as age, lifestyle,
location, ethnicity education and reading levels
tend to be overlooked.
Approximately
one third of women with breast cancer live in rural
or remote areas. Research has also highlighted the
paucity of information and support available to
these women and their families.(6)
The National Breast Cancer Centre has identified
information access, psycho-social support and service
provision as priority needs in these areas
(7).
|
|
Addressing the need for customised, in-time access to breast cancer knowledge
|
| |
This
project aimed to:
- investigate
and analyse diverse information needs amongst women
with breast cancer and their families
- identify
and analyse existing knowledge resources
- design
an appropriate scheme for the description of these
resources, in order to support differentiated online
information access
- develop
and prototype a design for a web-based user-sensitive
portal to breast cancer knowledge online.
Together,
these four strands of the project resulted in an
intelligent interface capable of matching user-aware
resource descriptions and user needs profiles, providing
a user-sensitive gateway to breast cancer knowledge
online.
The notion of a user-sensitive portal is innovative in several respects:
- The
development of a metadata schema for user-aware
resource description will involve pioneering methodologies
for translating a user-needs analysis and information
resource assessments into a metadata schema specification.
Existing metadata schema are generally resource-centric
and modelled on traditional bibliographic approaches.
They have few elements that deal directly with the
target audience.(8)
- New
approaches to systems analysis and implementation
will be required to meet the needs of users in their
role as participants in social interaction processes.(9)
- New
knowledge management systems approaches will be
applied to design an interface capable of matching
complex user needs profiles with user-aware resource
descriptions.
- The
prototyping of the portal design envisaged
for this project will test the capacity of existing
best practice in this area to provide differentiated
access to information.
|
| Project Benefits |
|
- For
women with breast cancer and their families this
project will provide a quality, evidence-based,
single entry point supporting customised, in-time
information access. Users will be able to engage
in informed decision making at their own pace and
with privacy. Consumers access to information
about their own health is an important right in
itself, however there is evidence that the ability
to make informed treatment and lifestyle decisions
improves clinical outcomes, in particular by supporting
better treatment compliance and greater uptake of
evidence-based practice.(10)
- For
women in rural and remote areas the project will
address some of the inequities of information access
posed by distance. Any internet based resource addresses
this issue to some extent, however, this project
will specifically research the additional information
and decision support needs of women in rural and
remote areas and incorporate this understanding
into the interface design.
- The
user needs analysis and resource assessment will
identify any current gaps in information content,
enabling medical, government and consumer bodies
to improve information provision in these areas.
- The
project will contribute to the development of national
benchmark for the quality control of breast cancer
information provision by providing a knowledge of
user needs, qualitative assessment of existing resources
and models for user-sensitive information provision.
As well as providing feedback to information providers
on any shortcomings in the resources they currently
produce, over time this will lead to a reduction
of unnecessary duplication of information, with
implications for improved efficiency across the
health sector.
- Both
the metadata schema and the portal design will provide
models which are transferable into other areas of
information provision within and beyond the health
sector. For example, the concept of a user-aware
portal could be applied to the provision of community
legal information or consumer information about
government information resources and services.
- The
project will advance understandings and methodologies
in the IT and metadata communities in relation to
developing user-sensitive intelligent interfaces
supported by metadata schemas.
- The
project will provide industry and consumer-oriented
IT research training in the context of an innovative
multidisciplinary study.
- The
research will position Australia as a leading authority
internationally in the area of intelligent interfaces
to knowledge online using user-needs profiling and
user-aware metadata resource descriptions.
|
| Project Methodology |
|
There
were four components to the project:
1.
User needs analysis and profiling
2.
Information resource identification, assessment
and description
3.
Development of a metadata repository of user-aware
resource descriptions
4.
Design and prototyping of an intelligent portal
1. User needs analysis and profiling
Aims:
- To
identify and profile the medical and societal information
and decision-support needs of women with breast
cancer and their family and friends.
- To
explore how differences in age, educational levels,
socio-economic backgrounds, stage of treatment,
ethnicity and residential location in city or rural
areas determine these needs.
- To
determine the extent to which current delivery of
information resources (online and off-line) meets
these needs.
Recently
social science research methods have emphasised contextualised
understandings of human behaviour. This has resulted
in interpretivist research (11)
becoming increasingly popular, in particular ethnographic
and other naturalistic methods. A user-centered approach
is considered crucial to understanding the multiple
perspectives, needs, individual and social contexts
of a range of different people who are seeking information
about breast cancer.
In
2001 Dr Kirsty Williamson received funding through
the Monash Small Grants Scheme to conduct an exploratory
study of the user-needs associated with effective
and intelligent information delivery amongst women
with breast cancer. The fieldwork commenced in this
pilot project was extended as part of the larger
Breast Cancer Knowledge Online project. The purpose
of the fieldwork, under the direction of Chief Investigator
Dr Kirsty Williamson, was to understand the differentiated
information needs of people with breast cancer and
their families. It involved:
- Individual
interviews with about 30 women who had experienced
breast cancer and with family members and friends
closely involved with someone who has had breast
cancer. About one-third of these interviews were conducted in rural areas. A sample, purposively
selected to represent various demographic variables
to be included in the study, will be recruited through
community organizations.
- Approximately
six focus groups of 6-8 people (including those
undertaken as part of the pilot project). Four of
these (three in Melbourne and one in a rural area)
included women who have experienced breast cancer
and two (one in Melbourne and one in a rural area)
will be comprised of carers, relatives and friends.
Again, the sample was purposively selected to
represent various demographic variables to be included
in the study, and were recruited through community
organizations.
This
combination of individual interviews and focus groups
minimises the weaknesses and maximises the strengths
of each method(12).
The resulting data was analysed using NVivo, a
package for the analysis of qualitative data.
2. Information resource identification, assessment and description
Aim:
- To
identify, assess, quality rate and describe relevant
resources and identify gaps in information provision,
with reference to the user needs analysis and profiling.
The
burgeoning of the internet health industry is cause
for both concern and optimism. It represents the democratisation
of healthcare information whilst simultaneously facilitating
quackery, commercialism and plain inaccurate
medical knowledge. Much of the recent
literature focuses on the quality of health
sites their potential uses and dangers. Under
the leadership of Chief Investigators Associate Professor
Julie Fisher and Ms June Anderson and with input from
experts from BreastCare Victoria, this component will
identify sources which meet the criteria established
by organizations such as DISCERN, MITRETEK, BIOME(13)
and the JAMA guide to Quality on the Net. Assessment
in accordance with these criteria takes into account
accuracy, source, authorship, commercial affiliations
and extent of evidence-based protocols. Furthermore,
each site was evaluated according to defined criteria,
specified from the results of the user needs analysis,
which address issues such as reading levels, intended
audience, use of medical terminology and suitability
for the differing needs of the target audience for
the portal. The outcomes of the metadata component
(below) were also to be used in the description of the
resources.
3. Development of a metadata repository of user-aware resource descriptions
Aims:
- To
specify metadata schema requirements to enable user-aware
resource description and facilitate the matching
of resources to user needs profiles.
- To
develop a metadata repository or database containing
user-aware descriptions of relevant information
resources.
This
component, directed by Chief Investigator Sue McKemmish,
is a critical component of the portal. It
enables the matching of user needs profiles to information
resources and the provision of value-added information
to the user about the resource being accessed (for
example, its provenance, authority, authoritativeness,
quality, any conditions and costs associated with
access). Specification of an appropriate metadata
schema (which identifies in a standardised way the
elements needed to describe a resource) is a
critical part of this component of the project. Existing
metadata schemes (Dublin Core, Australian Government
Locator Service) were investigated to determine
the extent to which they meet the requirements of
the project. They were then extended and customised
to enable the description of resources in ways sensitive
to the needs of target audiences. Schema analysis,
metadata modelling, concept mapping of metadata schemas
and standards and empirical instantiation (which populates
models with examples) were then used to develop the
schematic structure for the metadata repository(14).
New methods were developed to translate the outcomes
of the user needs analysis, user profiling and resource
assessment into specifications for metadata/metadata
schema requirements for user-sensitive resource descriptions
to be stored in the metadata repository. The final
stage of this component involved designing and
building the metadata repository itself, and populating
it with the resource descriptions.
An
APAI scholarship holder will be engaged in this component
of the project.
4. Design and prototype of an intelligent portal
Aims:
- To
specify design requirements for an intelligent interface
which provides differentiated access to breast cancer
knowledge online through a single entry point.
- To
build a prototype of the interface.
- To
test the delivery of information relevant to users
needs.
An
intelligent, user-sensitive portal is a web-based
interface which meets information needs by matching
user needs profiles with relevant resource descriptions
and provides a gateway to the resources themselves.
Chief Investigator associate Professor Frada Burstein directed the design and prototyping of the interface.
An
APAI scholarship holder engaged in the design
aspect of this component undertaking a comprehensive
analysis of web-based information resources such as
intelligent interfaces, portals and knowledge resources
within the framework of knowledge management support.
The aim of the analysis was to address the research question of
how differential user needs can be addressed by an
intelligent portal using contemporary knowledge management
system approaches. The outcome was a proposal
for a system architecture best suited to the project.
The
prototype is a web application built on a Windows
XP Platform, using MySQL as the back end database,
Java programming language, Javascript and HTML pages
at the user interface level. It is a three layer
application based on HotMeta™, an entry-level
document metadata product consisting of a broker that
combines the functions of a metadata repository and
a search engine (HotMeta™ was developed by the
Distributed Systems
Technology Centre (DSTC)).
Research
into factors which increase efficiency(15),
together with the findings of the user-needs study
informed the design. The prototype was extensively
tested using the original focus groups and a formal
user satisfaction instrument (for example one available
from Chin, Diehl and Norman, 1988(16)).
It was also trialled in actual clinical settings
where breast cancer patients and their families were able to
evaluate it against the major objectives of timeliness
and individual relevance. This included usability
testing using the methodology recommended by Dumas
and Redish (1994). (17)
|
| Project Timetable |
| |
| Component |
Estimated
delivery date |
| User
needs analysis and profiling |
|
| |
Analysis
of problem, field work design
|
January-March
2002 |
| |
Fieldwork
1 - interviews
|
March
- April 2002 |
| |
Preliminary
data analysis
|
May
2002 |
| |
Fieldwork
2 - interviews & focus groups
|
June
- October 2002 |
| |
Data
analysis, interpretation & communication
of results
|
September
- October 2002 |
| Information
resource identification, assessment & description |
|
| |
Identification
& assessment
|
January
- December 2002 |
| |
Description
& metatagging
|
April
- June 2003 |
| Metadata
repository |
|
| |
Investigation
of existing schema
|
January
- June 2002 |
| |
Specification
of metadata requirements
|
May
- December 2002 |
| |
Developmentt
of schema
|
January
- March 2003 |
| |
Building
of repository
|
April
- June 2003 |
| Design
& prototype of intelligent portal |
|
| |
Investigation
|
June
- December 2002 |
| |
Design
|
January
- June 2003 |
| |
Evaluation
& testing
|
July
- September 2003 |
| Re-evaluation |
October
- November 2003 |
| Publication/dissemination
of results |
November
- December 2003 |
|
| |
|
| |
1.
National Health Management Advisory Council, 1998
2. Australian Institute
of Health and Welfare
3.
For example, Girgis, Afaf and Foot, Glenda (1995). Satisfaction
with Breast Cancer Care: A Summary of the Literature
1984-1994, King's Cross, NSW, NHMRC National Breast
Cancer Centre and NSW Cancer Council; and Coulter, Angela,
Entwistle Vikki and Gilbert, David (1999). 'Sharing
Decisions with Patients: is the information good enough?',
British Medical Journal, 318: 318-322.
4. Slaytor, Emma
and Ward, Jeanette (1998). 'How Risks of Breast Cancer
and Benefits of Screening are Communicated to Women:
analysis of 58 pamphlets', British Medical Journal,
317 (7153): 263-264
5 For example
Bilodeau, B.A. and Degner, L.F. (1996). 'Informational
Needs, Sources of Information and Decisional Roles in
Women with Breast Cancer', Oncology Nursing Forum, 23:
691-696
6. (Wilkes, Lesley,
White, Kate and O'Riordan, Libba (2001). 'Empowerment
through Information: supporting rural families of oncology
patients in palliative care', Australian Journal of
Rural Health, 8: 41-46
7. National Breast
Cancer Centre, 1999
8. Existing schema
for metadata resource description include Dublin Core
(http://dublincore.org/)
and the Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS)
(http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/gov_online/agls/summary.html).
9. Cecez-Kecmanovic,
D. (2000). 'The Discipline of Information Systems -
Boundaries crossed, boundaries pushed', a keynote address
at the Conference Transcending Boundaries: Integrating
People, Processes and Systems, Brisbane, 6-8 September
2000.
10. National
Health InformationManagement Advisory Council, 1999.
11. Interpretivists
see themselves as dealing with multiple realities which
are socially (Berger and Luckman, 1967) and individually
(Kelly, 1956) constructed in particular contexts. Guba
and Lincon refer to these multiple realities as layers
of an onion, nesting within or complementing each other.
'Each layer provides a different perspective of reality,
and none can be considered more "true" than
any other' (Guba, Egon and Lincon (1981). Effective
Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco). See also Berger,
Peter and Luckman, Thomas (1967). The Social Construction
of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.
Anchor Press, New York; and Kelly, George (1955) The
Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols 1 and 2, Norton,
New York.
12. Williamson,
Kirsty (2000) Research Methods for Students and Professionals:
Information Management and Systems. Wagga Wagga, NSW:
Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University,
pp 238-241
13. DISCERN:
http://www.discern.org.uk, MITRETEK: http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/ig,
BIOME: http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/factors.html.
14. McKemmish,
Sue et al (1999). 'Describing Records in Context in
the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata
Schema' Archivaria, 48 (Fall): 3-43
15. There is
a wide range of studies which suggest factors that increase
the efficiency of internet-based information resources,
including content requirements (Abels, E., White, M.
and Hahn, K. (1998) 'A User-Based Design Process for
Web Sites', Internet Research: Electronic Networking
Applications and Policy 8 (1): 39-48), understanding
the target audience(s) (Abels, White and Hahn (1998),
and Nel, D., van Niekerk, R., Berthon, J. and Davies,
T. (1999). 'Going with the Flow: web sites and customer
involvement', Internet Research: Electronic Networking
Applications and Policy, 9 (2): 109-116), ease of use
(Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2000). 'The Relative Importance
of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of
E-Commerce Adoption', Journal of the Association of
Information Systems 1 (8): 1-30) and navigation flow
(Neilsen, J. (1999). 'User Interface Directions for
the Web', Communications of the ACM. 42 (1): 65-73.
16. Chin, J.P.,
Diehl, V.A. and Norman, K.L. (1988). 'Development of
and Instrument Measuring User Satisfaction of the Human-Computer
Interface', Proceedings of the CHI '88 Conference: Human
Factors in Computing Systems, 213-218
17. Dumas, J.
and Redish, J. (1994). A Practical Guide to Usability
Testing, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New
Jersey.
|
|
|
|
|
Contact
the EIRG webmaster
|
|
|
Copyright © Monash University 2002 - All rights reserved - Caution - Updated
06/10/2005
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|